Vector launched!

Garmin announced today the launch of the Vector pedal.

Vector


Pretty exciting stuff. I've written a lot here about the then-Metrigear Vector. This certainly looks a lot like the Metrigear version did. Of course the devil's in the details, and I know a lot of development has occurred since Garmin bought Metrigear.

It will be very interesting to see how this plays out. I know that when I'm riding sometimes I feel asymmetric, that my left leg maybe isn't working as hard as my right. But that's based on perceived exertion... now you'll be able to see real numbers.

And for tandems. I don't think there's another option (other than the Look/Polar) for independently measuring stoker and captain power. How many times have I seen a guy pulling his 8-year-old kid on a Trail-A-Bike and the kid (or kids in the case of the linked version) are slacking off? Slap some Vectors on that puppy and keep an eye on those little parasites.

For portability it's a bit of a wash. Swapping wheels (PowerTap), cranks (SRM and Quarq), or pedals (Polar/Look or Garmin) can all be done within a few minutes. But for travel, I think it's fair to say the pedal system is the most portable. You probably travel with your pedals anyway when you are going to rent a bike.

On Polar/Look versus Garmin: I think there's not much contest here in terms of ANT+ Sport or Polar's proprietary communications protocol. Big advantage Garmin. It will be interesting to see when each of the units get exposed to third-party scrutiny how they compare.

I am disappointed the pedals are Exustar Look-compatibles, as I'm a Speedplay fan, or particularly a fan of low-stack light double-sided pedals. Tyler Farrar was testing these pedals last December, so no surprise here.

Anyway, I'm sure there will a lot more to say on this...

Comments

heeltoer said…
1500 for just the pedals seems a bit high, 1800 gets you cyclops and one zipp wheel.

sigh, so much for attracting a broader range of cyclists.
August 18, 2011 at 10:41 AM
djconnel said…
I'm not going to criticize their pricing strategy: they obviously need to recoup development costs. And in a sense it's two independent power meters for $1500, one for each leg :). I'd rather have Vector than Powertap, especially since my Powertap failed my torque tests (which another Powertap passed): see posts tagged with "Powertap".
August 18, 2011 at 11:00 AM
naisan said…
Love your blog and posts on ww, but this black bkg wht foreground is killing me - leaves ghost images on my eyes for minutes after reading an article. CAn you lighten up the bkg a touch? Would make reading a touch less painful.
August 19, 2011 at 9:11 PM
djconnel said…
Curious: I just used one of the blogger standard template. I try a dark blue background and I lose text contrast. What browser are you using? Perhaps it is a font problem. Or do you never like black backgrounds?
August 20, 2011 at 7:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Election Day

Image
Well, The People have spoken. Smart Voter has some really nice results listings. A few comments on proposition results : 13 passed. I suspect a lot of remods are now going to be classified as "earthquake safety upgrades". Seems like an accounting nightmare. Oh, well. 14 passed. There is hope for the Republican Party! This may be the end of the socially radical wing of the "conservatives" (cough!). Katherine Roberts has pointed out there's nothing conservative about the right-wing. Moderate Republicans, like Tom Campbell (who polled ahead of Carly Fiorina only among "liberal" Republicans in California, but would have gotten my vote as a Democrat) will have a chance. And fiscally irresponsible Democrats like Barbara Boxer and Nancy Pelosi will face more competition. All good. But that in the primary that each voter gets only one vote brings up some interesting game theory questions. For example, consider the Senate race. Suppose I support
Read more

Proposed update to the 1-second gap rule: 3-second gap

It's been a long time since I've done a post here, mainly because I've been working from home a lot, and the loss of my mind-numbing Caltrain commute means loss of blogging time. But I'm compelled to break the silence, at least briefly, to propose a change to the UCI cycling rules... Here's a video of the final km of stage 4 of the Tour Down Under this year . It was a twisty-curvy run to the finish, riders strung out in a single line, the sprinters and "puncheurs" at the front, the climbers drifting further back. Results are on CyclingNews . You can't directly see it from the video but Richie Port (BMC) let a gap open in front of him, that gap according to the finish line timing exceeding the 1 second threshold of the UCI rules (general regulations) : 1.2.107 When several riders finish in a group, all riders in the same groupe shall be credited with the same time. If there is a difference of one second or more between the back of the back wheel o
Read more

Marin Avenue (Berkeley)

Image
On Saturday, I got an email from Tim telling letting me know that Murphy's Spring Classics was going to start up Marin Ave. I'd missed that. Murphy announces his courses the day before, and indeed it was already well into the night before when the course announcement went out. I'd skipped over the details, jumping straight to middle and end games. Marin? I laughed at the irony, because not long before when he'd told me he was choosing to repeat the Nifty Twn Fifty which we'd done together last year versus selecting Murphy Mack's Stage Mullett two-day, I responded I didn't think I had it in me to ride Marin Ave two years in succession. Well, so much for that. I was committed, so I went downstairs to swap my 11-26 cassette for my Recon 12-27. The name is easily overlooked: "Marin Ave" fails to strike the same impression as, for example, "Redwood Gulch" or "China Grade". But among those in the know, Marin Ave is infamous i
Read more